In a bid to address discrimination against individuals seeking mental health care and substance abuse treatments, the Biden administration is set to take action against health insurance plans that fail to comply with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. The Act, established in 2008, mandates insurance plans to provide the same level of coverage for mental health services as they do for other medical conditions.
Neera Tanden, White House domestic policy advisor, expressed concerns that many insurance providers are sidestepping the law, creating obstacles for patients attempting to access mental health care. A common issue is the insufficient number of therapists in the network, leading patients to seek care out-of-network and incur higher costs. Additionally, insurers often require pre-approval for treatment, leading to claim denials and financial burdens for patients.
As a result, numerous insured individuals are left with no choice but to pay out-of-pocket when they should be covered. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, more than 58 million people in the U.S. suffer from a mental illness, highlighting the urgency of rectifying the situation.
To address these disparities, a proposed rule by the Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury departments would compel insurance plans to assess how their coverage policies affect patients’ access to mental health and substance abuse treatments. Non-compliant insurers would be required to take corrective actions, such as expanding their network of therapists if patients frequently seek out-of-network care.
The proposed rule is expected to undergo a 60-day public comment period before its finalization. A survey conducted by the research institute NORC revealed that individuals with insurance face more challenges accessing mental health services compared to other medical treatments. Close to 40% of people insured through their employers had to opt for more expensive out-of-network mental health care or substance abuse treatment. In comparison, only 15% sought physical health care out-of-network.
Moreover, over 50% of patients reported having mental health or substance abuse service claims denied three or more times, while the same occurred for only 33% of physical health care claims. Shockingly, nearly 60% of surveyed individuals seeking mental health or substance abuse treatment did not receive any care on at least one occasion.
By implementing this proposed rule, the Biden administration aims to ensure that health insurance plans comply with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, providing fair and accessible mental health care and substance abuse treatments for all Americans.
The proposed crackdown on health insurance plans regarding mental health care and substance abuse treatments could potentially have an impact on the stock market and the economy. Here are some ways it could play out:
Healthcare Sector Stocks: The proposed rule may directly affect companies operating in the healthcare sector, particularly health insurance providers. If the rule is finalized and implemented, insurers may face increased costs in expanding their network of therapists and complying with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. This could impact their profit margins and lead to fluctuations in their stock prices.
Pharmaceutical Companies: As the demand for mental health and substance abuse treatments potentially increases due to improved access to care, pharmaceutical companies producing relevant medications may experience higher demand for their products. This could positively impact their stock performance.
Economic Productivity: Improving access to mental health care and substance abuse treatments can have broader economic implications. When individuals receive appropriate care for mental health issues, they may experience improved overall well-being and productivity in the workplace. This, in turn, could positively influence economic growth and stability.
Healthcare Costs: While the proposed rule aims to make mental health care more accessible for patients, it may also lead to increased healthcare costs. Insurance companies could pass on these additional expenses to consumers through higher premiums or copayments, potentially impacting household budgets and overall consumer spending.
Investor Sentiment: The healthcare sector is a significant part of the economy, and any proposed regulatory changes can impact investor sentiment. Uncertainty regarding the finalization and implications of the rule could lead to fluctuations in the stock market as investors assess the potential risks and opportunities in the sector.
Economic Impact of Mental Health: The mental health of the workforce has a direct impact on productivity, absenteeism, and overall economic output. Improving access to mental health care could lead to better workforce productivity and reduced healthcare costs in the long run.
About Author
