The billionaire entrepreneur sparked fresh controversy this week after posting details on X that appear to conflict with information contained in SpaceX’s official IPO filing. The discrepancy centers on a massive artificial intelligence infrastructure agreement with AI startup Anthropic, a deal that could potentially represent billions of dollars in future revenue.
For investors trying to determine whether SpaceX deserves its staggering valuation of more than $1 trillion, the difference is not a minor detail.
It could significantly alter how Wall Street values the company.
The controversy also raises a larger question: Is SpaceX primarily a rocket company, an AI infrastructure company, or something in between?
That answer could determine whether investors view the IPO as an attractive opportunity or an overpriced risk.
The Deal At The Center Of The Controversy
Earlier this month, SpaceX announced that it would lease unused computing capacity from its Colossus 1 data center in Memphis, Tennessee, to AI startup Anthropic.
The arrangement initially appeared to be a major breakthrough.
According to SpaceX’s IPO prospectus, Anthropic agreed to pay approximately $1.25 billion per month through May 2029. The filing stated that computing capacity would gradually ramp up during 2026 and noted that either party could terminate the agreement with 90 days notice.
At first glance, investors interpreted the deal as a long-term commitment potentially worth tens of billions of dollars.
That would be a game-changing development.
SpaceX generated approximately $18.7 billion in total revenue during 2025. A multi-year AI infrastructure agreement could create a completely new revenue stream that rivals or even exceeds some of its existing businesses.
Then Musk posted a clarification on X.
According to Musk, the arrangement was actually a 180-day lease with a mutual 90-day cancellation provision afterward.
In other words, the deal may be far shorter and less predictable than many investors initially believed.
The problem is that this shorter timeline was not clearly described in the IPO filing.
For investors, the distinction matters enormously.
A three-year revenue commitment carries a vastly different valuation than a six-month agreement that could be terminated relatively quickly.
Why Wall Street Is Paying Attention
When companies prepare for public offerings, every material disclosure matters.
Investors rely on IPO filings to understand financial risks, future opportunities, revenue visibility, and growth potential.
Any perceived inconsistency between public statements and official filings can create uncertainty.
And uncertainty is something investors typically punish.
Corporate governance experts immediately noticed the issue.
Eric Talley, a professor at Columbia Law School, suggested that either Musk’s comments are correct and the filing is incomplete, or the filing is correct and Musk’s comments are inaccurate.
Neither scenario is particularly comforting for prospective shareholders.
The concern goes beyond a single contract.
It touches on a fundamental question about management credibility.
Investors need confidence that the information they are using to value a company is complete and reliable.
When conflicting narratives emerge days before an IPO roadshow begins, that confidence can weaken.
The Bigger Story: SpaceX’s Massive AI Bet
While headlines continue focusing on rockets and space exploration, one of the most important developments inside SpaceX is happening on Earth.
The company’s growing artificial intelligence ambitions are becoming increasingly central to its financial story.
Following Musk’s decision to merge xAI with SpaceX earlier this year, the combined company now encompasses:
- Rocket launches
- Satellite internet through Starlink
- AI infrastructure
- Large language models
- Data center operations
- Computing services
The scale of investment is staggering.
According to the IPO filing, SpaceX spent $10.1 billion on capital expenditures during the first quarter alone.
Approximately $7.7 billion of that spending was tied to AI-related operations.
That’s an enormous figure even by Silicon Valley standards.
For comparison, many publicly traded technology companies do not spend that much on capital investments in an entire year.
The Profitability Problem
Investors often tolerate losses if they see a clear path toward future profitability.
The challenge for SpaceX is that its AI division is currently consuming extraordinary amounts of cash.
According to the prospectus, the AI segment recorded an operating loss of roughly $2.5 billion during the first quarter.
That raises a key question.
If SpaceX built massive computing infrastructure for its own AI ambitions, why is it leasing capacity to Anthropic?
Some analysts view the move positively.
Cathie Wood of Ark Invest argued that monetizing unused computing resources is a smart business decision that could generate billions in annual revenue.
Others see it differently.
Critics argue the deal suggests that demand for SpaceX’s own AI products may not yet justify the enormous infrastructure investment.
If the company is renting out computing power because it cannot fully utilize it internally, investors may question whether those investments are producing the expected returns.
The answer likely lies somewhere in the middle.
Either way, investors will want more clarity.
Missing Information Is Becoming A Recurring Theme
The Anthropic controversy isn’t the only issue analysts have identified.
PitchBook analyst Franco Granda recently highlighted several areas where he believes SpaceX’s IPO filing lacks detail.
Among the concerns:
- Subscriber churn rates
- Falcon 9 launch economics
- Detailed AI revenue segmentation
- Utilization rates of deployed computing infrastructure
- Breakdown of AI subscription revenue
For a traditional industrial company, these omissions might be less significant.
For a company seeking a valuation north of $1 trillion, they become much more important.
Investors are being asked to pay premium prices.
In return, they typically expect premium transparency.
Why This Matters For The IPO
SpaceX’s public debut was already expected to face intense scrutiny.
The company reportedly continues burning billions of dollars annually while investing aggressively in AI, satellites, and next-generation space technologies.
That doesn’t necessarily make the business unattractive.
Amazon lost money for years before becoming one of the most valuable companies in the world.
Tesla endured years of skepticism before rewarding long-term shareholders.
The difference is that investors generally understood the growth story.
The challenge for SpaceX is that its story appears increasingly complex.
Is it:
- A space company?
- A telecommunications company?
- An AI company?
- A cloud computing provider?
- A combination of all four?
Each category deserves different valuation metrics.
Each category carries different risks.
And investors need accurate information to decide how much those future opportunities are worth today.
What Investors Should Watch Next
The good news for SpaceX is that IPO filings can be amended.
Legal experts note that the company has the opportunity to clarify disclosures before shares begin trading.
Investors should closely monitor future updates to the S-1 filing.
Specifically, they should watch for:
Clarification Of The Anthropic Agreement
The exact duration, cancellation rights, and revenue expectations could significantly affect valuation models.
Additional AI Financial Disclosures
More detail regarding AI revenues, utilization rates, and customer demand could help investors better understand the economics of the business.
Updated Risk Factors
The company may add language explaining potential uncertainties surrounding major commercial agreements.
Management Commentary During The Roadshow
Executives will likely face direct questions from institutional investors regarding the apparent discrepancy.
Their answers could influence investor confidence heading into the offering.
The Investor Takeaway
SpaceX remains one of the most ambitious companies ever brought to public markets.
Its portfolio includes dominant positions in launch services, satellite internet, and increasingly artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Those opportunities explain why investors have attached a valuation exceeding $1 trillion.
But the events of this week also highlight an important reality.
The larger and more complex a company becomes, the more transparency matters.
When investors are evaluating what could become the largest IPO in history, even seemingly small disclosure inconsistencies can have billion-dollar implications.
The Anthropic controversy may ultimately prove to be a simple misunderstanding that gets clarified through updated filings.
Or it could reveal deeper questions about how investors should value SpaceX’s rapidly expanding AI business.
Either way, Wall Street is watching closely.
And as SpaceX moves toward its historic public debut, investors will be looking for something that may be even more valuable than rockets, satellites, or artificial intelligence:
Clear answers.
About Author
