Nike Announces More Job Cuts as Sales Slide. Is the Stock a Bargain?

Thoughtful Shopper Weighs a Nike Purchase

Nike is planning another round of job cuts and warning that sales will fall further this year. For people considering its beaten-down shares, the question is whether the lower price compensates for a turnaround that is taking longer and becoming more expensive.

Shares were trading at $33.03, down approximately 6%, at 11:10 a.m. Eastern on October 2. That represented a recovery from the roughly 10% decline reported before the market opened, although investors were still marking down the company’s prospects.

Nike remains a recognizable global brand with a profitable business. The latest results show why recognition alone has not been enough to restore growth.

Nike’s Recovery Is Still Uneven

Nike released its fiscal first-quarter results October 1, covering the three months ended August 31. The company reported weakness across several important parts of its business:

MeasureLatest Result
Total revenue$11.2 billion, down 4%
Nike Direct revenue$4.1 billion, down 8%
Nike digital salesDown 13%
Converse revenue$263 million, down 28%
Gross margin42.8%, up 0.6 percentage points

Figures are reported changes unless otherwise indicated.

The regional picture was mixed. North American sales increased 2% on a currency-neutral basis, while Greater China sales fell 26% on the same basis. Reuters reported that China revenue has now declined for nine consecutive quarters.

That makes the recovery harder to judge. Progress in one market can be overwhelmed by deterioration elsewhere, and successful performance products still have to offset weakness in larger established categories.

Another Restructuring, With Benefits Years Away

Nike’s new restructuring program, called Pace, includes changes to its geographic organization, supply chain and staffing. The company has not disclosed how many jobs will be eliminated, with employee notifications expected to begin in 2027. WSJ

Nike targets approximately $2.5 billion in cumulative savings through fiscal 2031. Those savings come before roughly $1 billion in expected pretax restructuring charges and any future reinvestment. Reuters reported that most savings are expected in fiscal 2029 and 2030.

The timing matters for shareholders. A multiyear savings target offers limited protection against another disappointing quarter, and cumulative savings should not be confused with an annual increase in profit.

Cost reductions can improve efficiency and preserve earnings. Restoring demand requires customers to choose Nike’s products at prices that produce acceptable profits.

China Adds Another Complication

Nike is tightening control over its distribution in China, including removing online selling rights from some retail partners starting in January. The company wants to improve pricing and how its products reach consumers, but management expects the transition to pressure near-term revenue and profitability.

That creates a difficult period for anyone watching the turnaround. Some lost sales may reflect deliberate changes intended to improve the business. Other declines may reflect customers choosing competitors.

Both can occur simultaneously. Investors need evidence that cleaner distribution eventually produces stronger demand, rather than assuming every reduction in sales is a necessary step toward recovery.

A Lower Share Price Does Not Settle the Valuation Question

Nike expects fiscal 2027 revenue to decline by a high-single-digit percentage. Its adjusted earnings forecast is $1.15 to $1.35 per share, excluding specified restructuring expenses.

At the late-morning price of $33.03, that implies approximately 24 to 29 times projected adjusted earnings, calculated using the company’s guidance. The calculation illustrates why a large share-price decline does not automatically create a cheap stock. Investors also have to account for the earnings they expect the business to generate.

A buyer could reasonably expect earnings to improve after the restructuring and product reset. That investment case requires confidence in the recovery, including how long it takes and how much additional spending it requires.

Comparing today’s share price with a previous high does little to answer those questions.

The Dividend Deserves a Closer Look

Nike’s most recent declared quarterly dividend was 41 cents per share, payable October 1. Maintaining that quarterly rate would produce $1.64 annually, equivalent to a yield of roughly 5% at the quoted late-morning share price. Future payments depend on subsequent board declarations.

That is potentially appealing to readers looking for investment income. However, the annualized payout exceeds Nike’s projected adjusted earnings per share for fiscal 2027. This comparison raises a funding question; it does not establish that a dividend cut is coming.

Dividends are paid with cash, and earnings can differ from cash generation. The useful checks are whether operating cash flow covers dividends after necessary investment, how restructuring affects that cash flow, and what management says about future payments.

The yield has risen as the stock has fallen. That mathematical increase offers no assurance that the business has become stronger.

There Are Signs of Progress

Nike’s gross margin improved, helped primarily by lower warehousing and logistics costs. That gives investors some evidence that operational changes are producing benefits, even while revenue remains under pressure. about.nike.com

The source of the improvement matters. Lower operating costs can support profits, while sustained sales at stronger prices would provide additional evidence that customers want the products.

Nike’s results also require care as an indicator of the broader economy. Its regional performance, distribution changes and product decisions make it difficult to attribute the entire decline to weak consumer spending.

What Would Make the Recovery More Convincing?

The next results should be judged against a few concrete questions:

  • Are sales declines easing? Improvement across several categories would make the recovery less dependent on isolated successes.
  • Is China stabilizing? Distribution changes need to lead toward a healthier business after the initial disruption.
  • Are margins improving alongside demand? That would strengthen the case that operational progress can support lasting earnings growth.
  • Does cash generation support the dividend? This matters especially for shareholders relying on Nike for income.

Nike has the opportunity to rebuild its business, and the latest margin improvement shows that some changes are working. Its weaker sales outlook means buyers are still paying for a recovery that has yet to become broad and dependable.

For readers considering the shares, the strongest case will come from improving demand, earnings and cash flow. A familiar logo and a lower stock price provide a starting point for research, rather than a complete investment argument.

About Author

Leave a Reply