Global oil markets are being tugged in opposite directions as traders attempt to balance escalating geopolitical risk with a market that still looks structurally oversupplied. Sharp price swings over the past several sessions highlight how quickly sentiment can shift when Middle East security concerns collide with uncertain demand growth and expanding production elsewhere.
Energy prices surged earlier this week on fears that U.S. military action against Iran could disrupt shipping routes or regional production. Those gains faded just as quickly after President Donald Trump appeared to cool the rhetoric, triggering a pullback in crude futures.
At the same time, markets are still digesting the fallout from Washington’s stunning early January operation in Venezuela, where President Nicolás Maduro was seized in a U.S.-led raid. Investors are now grappling with what that could mean for future oil supply from the OPEC member nation, and whether U.S. energy companies could eventually gain access to its vast reserves.
The result is a volatile trading environment where short-term headlines are overpowering longer-term fundamentals.
Oil Prices Reverse After Geopolitical Jolt
Oil prices climbed earlier in the week after reports suggested that U.S. and U.K. forces were pulling personnel from a military base in Qatar, fueling speculation that a strike against Iran could be imminent. That move pushed crude higher for two consecutive sessions.
By Thursday, however, prices reversed sharply after Trump signaled that the administration was stepping back from immediate escalation.
Global benchmark Brent crude dropped roughly 3.7% in morning trading, with March futures near $64 per barrel. Front-month West Texas Intermediate crude also slid about 3.7%, settling near $60 per barrel.
The abrupt reversal underscored how fragile market confidence remains, especially when oil traders are trying to price in geopolitical risk premiums that can evaporate overnight.
Traders Brace for a “Choppy Ride”
Market strategists say the oil market is currently being pulled by two competing forces that make sustained trends difficult to maintain.
Marc Ostwald, chief economist and global strategist at ADM Investor Services, said supply fundamentals still point toward downward pressure on prices.
“Oil markets are very much subject to two opposing forces, and the overall profile of supply outpacing demand … leaving the market trading oil from the short side,” he told CNBC.
However, geopolitical threats create periodic spikes that can squeeze short positions.
“On the other hand, the potential disruption to supply from geopolitical tensions in Iran and Venezuela leaves it vulnerable to short squeezes, particularly with that U.S. threat of 25% tariffs on any country trading with Iran.”
Ostwald added that concerns about U.S. military involvement carry broader implications beyond Iran itself, particularly for shipping lanes.
“As long as those factors remain in play, it’s going to be a choppy ride,” he said.
The Strait of Hormuz remains a major focal point for traders. Roughly one fifth of the world’s daily oil consumption passes through the narrow waterway, making any military escalation in the region a potential shock to global supply chains.
Supply Has Not Actually Changed Yet
Despite heightened tensions, some economists argue that the underlying oil balance has not materially shifted.
Ed Bell, acting chief economist and group head of research at Emirates NBD, said markets continue to monitor production levels closely, but no real disruption has occurred so far.
“When it comes down to it, markets are going to be watching out for: Has there been a change to production in the critical Gulf producers? No. Has there been a change to oil supply or natural gas supply coming out from the Gulf to international markets? No,” Bell said on CNBC’s “Access Middle East.”
Iran, an OPEC member, produces roughly 3 million barrels per day, making any interruption potentially meaningful for global balances. But current unrest has not yet translated into supply losses.
“We have no indication that any of that has been interrupted as a result of the protest movement that we have seen in the last couple of weeks,” Bell said. “But clearly that is a substantial amount of oil that could be at risk if there is any further escalation or an aggravation of a military event.”
Bell compared the latest price swing to previous geopolitical flare-ups, including last year’s U.S. involvement in Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites.
“You had a very rapid and aggravated move upward in oil prices, but as it became clear that there was no change to the fundamental picture, that sold off quite quickly,” he said. “As no real change in the situation has materialized, and we have this cooling of the rhetoric coming from Trump, we are seeing markets react accordingly.”
Before the Iran unrest, Bell’s team expected ample supply growth in 2026, modest demand expansion, and a sizable inventory overhang. That outlook has not changed.
“Until we have any kind of real material change in the movement of molecules out of the region, then we will expect to see prices normalized back to what we had anticipated for 2026 prior to the focus on Iran,” he said.
Economic Growth Could Support Prices Longer Term
Not all analysts are bearish. Some believe global economic acceleration could eventually provide a floor for crude prices even if near-term volatility persists.
Paul Jackson, global market strategist for EMEA at Invesco, said geopolitical uncertainty remains a wildcard, but underlying growth trends may lift energy demand over time.
“However, the price has recently been pushed in opposite directions by two geopolitical events,” Jackson said, referring to expectations that Venezuela could reenter global supply channels after U.S. intervention and the escalating situation in Iran.
“Geopolitical developments are difficult to predict and can rapidly change course,” he said.
Jackson added that Iran carries greater short-term risk.
“The situation in Iran could have the bigger immediate impact, thus lending an upward bias to price forecasts. If anything, this adds to our conviction that the oil price will rise this year based on global economic acceleration.”
Invesco’s year-end forecast for Brent crude sits around $75 per barrel, implying roughly 15% upside from current levels, though still below last year’s highs near $83.
Oversupply Limits the Upside
Other market participants caution that even significant geopolitical tension may struggle to overcome a supply-heavy market.
Tamas Varga of oil broker PVM said geopolitical risk tends to stabilize prices but does not necessarily drive sustained rallies when inventories remain elevated.
“Geopolitics prevents prices from falling heavily, and perceived oversupply hampers them from rallying hard,” Varga said.
He added that unless Iran’s exports are materially disrupted, upside may be limited.
“The base case scenario is that the recent move higher from below $60/bbl last week will not last, unless Iranian oil production and exports are materially affected by a possible U.S. military strike (unlikely). We see the downside around $55/bbl basis Brent, unless Venezuela manages to considerably ramp up its production.”
Varga also questioned whether Venezuela can meaningfully boost output anytime soon, despite political changes and U.S. interest in the country’s oil sector.
What Venezuela Means for OPEC and Global Supply
Trump has openly pushed for U.S. oil companies to gain control of Venezuela’s energy industry following Maduro’s capture. The White House has said the country could eventually provide millions of barrels of oil to U.S. markets.
If Venezuela successfully ramps production under new leadership and foreign investment, it could further pressure global prices and complicate OPEC’s supply management strategy.
Varga raised broader questions about how OPEC would respond if one of its founding members effectively comes under U.S. operational control.
“What is interesting to contemplate is how OPEC or Saudi Arabia will react to the U.S. takeover of the oil sector of a member country,” he said. “Should the Venezuelan oil industry rise from the ashes, who will set quotas? How will OPEC manage their shrinking influence on the supply side? Will OPEC retaliate by ramping up production or cutting it again?”
Those uncertainties add another layer of complexity for investors already navigating shifting alliances, trade policy risk, and evolving energy demand.
Investor Takeaways
For investors, the current oil environment demands caution and flexibility.
Short-term price movements are likely to remain headline-driven, with sharp swings possible on any development tied to Iran, shipping lanes, or U.S. military posture. At the same time, longer-term fundamentals still point to ample supply and moderate demand growth, limiting the probability of sustained price spikes unless physical disruptions occur.
Energy equities may continue to experience volatility, particularly companies with exposure to geopolitical regions or heavy upstream operations. Integrated oil majors with diversified production and strong balance sheets may be better positioned to weather turbulence, while refiners and transport firms could see margin pressure if price swings accelerate.
Investors should also monitor how the Trump administration’s Venezuela strategy unfolds, as any meaningful increase in production could reshape OPEC dynamics and global supply forecasts later this year.
In a market where geopolitical risk premiums appear and disappear quickly, disciplined risk management matters more than chasing short-term price momentum.
About Author
